Reviews provided by RottenTomatoes
Lou Lumenick, New York Post: [A] highly entertaining documentary ... Read more
Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal: "Tim's Vermeer," a fascinating documentary by the comic magicians Penn & Teller, has a way of arousing passionate feelings while provoking fresh ideas about the porous border between technology and art. Read more
Moira MacDonald, Seattle Times: "Tim's Vermeer" is about many things - art history, technology, painting technique, beauty - but ultimately it's a beguiling study of fascination. Read more
Peter Debruge, Variety: Penn and Teller's uncanny crowdpleaser begs the question, is it still a masterpiece if an amateur could do it? Read more
Ben Kenigsberg, AV Club: It's a cool hypothesis, catnip for art-history buffs, but it can't quite sustain feature length. Read more
Bill Goodykoontz, Arizona Republic: "Tim's Vermeer" is a movie for people who like to think, who like to ponder the big questions surrounding art and the act of creation. Read more
Ty Burr, Boston Globe: Some movies are great because of their artistry; "Tim's Vermeer" achieves greatness - OK, semi-greatness - by placing the act of artistic creation itself under a microscope. Read more
Michael Phillips, Chicago Tribune: "Tim's Vermeer" is a diverting 80-minute account of one man's mission to explore the Vermeer optics theory in detail. Read more
Peter Rainer, Christian Science Monitor: What Tim's Vermeer is really about is two geniuses, of very different sorts, communing across time and space. Read more
Tom Long, Detroit News: Unexpectedly dazzling. Read more
Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly: An exquisitely fun documentary that hits on a profound aesthetic question, one first posed in 2001 by David Hockney: Did the 17th-century Dutch painter Johannes Vermeer use optical devices to achieve his visual poetics of light? Read more
Todd McCarthy, Hollywood Reporter: A captivating look at a high-tech inventor who presumes to replicate the work of a great painter. Read more
Jake Coyle, Associated Press: The film - an ode to craftsmanship - establishes without a doubt that many of the traits we reserve for other fields - dedication, ingenuity - are also inherent to the artistic process. Ta-da. Read more
Betsy Sharkey, Los Angeles Times: A fascinating new documentary about art, obsessions, ideas and answers. Read more
Richard Brody, New Yorker: As mechanical as the procedure it depicts. Read more
Stephen Whitty, Newark Star-Ledger: The movie's painstaking attention to detail certainly puts you in mind of Vermeer's own, but even halfway through its short length it's easy to get restless. Read more
Bob Mondello, NPR: The process of putting those three-dimensional objects on canvas in natural light is so fascinating that no one's going to make jokes about watching paint dry - though at one point the film is literally about watching paint dry. And then applying varnish. Read more
Joe Neumaier, New York Daily News: The result is cool and semi-comical, but also serious. Read more
Manohla Dargis, New York Times: Shooting in unattractive, hard-edge digital, Teller condenses Mr. Jenison's years-long pursuit into 80 glib, alternately diverting, exasperating and tedious minutes. Read more
Michael Sragow, Orange County Register: Teller, the quiet half of the iconoclastic magic act Penn and Teller, crafts a captivating documentary portrait of the artist as a tinkerer. Read more
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer: Tim's Vermeer is film as forensics, bringing math and science to bear to solve an art-world mystery. Read more
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone: Art purists can relax since [inventor Tim] Jenison, a video wiz with little talent for painting, never really challenges Vermeer's genius for conception and composition. Technology is the thing at issue here. Read more
Colin Covert, Minneapolis Star Tribune: You might think that following this insanely ambitious DIY project would be like watching paint dry. Wrong. Read more
Joe Williams, St. Louis Post-Dispatch: We should never forget that Penn and Teller are professional bamboozlers, and their attempt to re-frame the definition of genius might be nothing but smoke and mirrors. Read more
James Adams, Globe and Mail: Mostly it is fascinating and compelling. Read more
Linda Barnard, Toronto Star: The result astonishes. A fascinating, funny and inspiring story. Read more
Eric Hynes, Time Out: Tim's finished Vermeer may resemble the real thing, but Tim's Vermeer never tackles the true mystery of why the latter is actually incomparable. Read more
Claudia Puig, USA Today: A fascinating documentary that poses a compelling aesthetic query: did 17th-century Dutch painter Johannes Vermeer use optical devices to achieve his gorgeously photo-realistic, light-filled artwork? Read more
Stephanie Zacharek, Village Voice: The charm of the whole enterprise wears off even before this movie's trim 80 minutes are up. Read more
Bilge Ebiri, New York Magazine/Vulture: Do we even want to see a movie arguing that the work of one of the greatest artists of all time could be re-created by a dude with some mirrors and no actual ability to paint? I'm not sure. But Tim's Vermeer has more on its mind than that. Read more
Michael O'Sullivan, Washington Post: "Tim's Vermeer" makes a convincing case that Vermeer could have painted the way Jenison says he did. It also makes a pretty powerful ancillary point: that some people are both geniuses and geeks. Read more