The Honeymooners 2005

Critics score:
13 / 100

Reviews provided by RottenTomatoes

Terry Lawson, Detroit Free Press: The best thing that can be said about the new Honeymooners is that it respects its elders: It plays like an episode of the show. The worst thing is that it plays like an episode of the show. Read more

Peter Debruge, Miami Herald: It's as if whenever The Honeymooners comes close to delivering on a funny idea, the movie runs screaming in the opposite direction. Read more

Michael Wilmington, Chicago Tribune: Though the patterns are there, the laughs aren't, mostly because the writing is so lazy and formulaic. Read more

Ted Fry, Seattle Times: Cedric the Entertainer comes close to sharing Gleason's gift for, well, entertaining. He's the biggest reason this version of The Honeymooners is such an amusing surprise. Read more

Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper: I like the cast. They're very talented, they're really funny, they have a dreadful script to work with. Read more

Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Read more

AV Club: Read more

Randy Cordova, Arizona Republic: This laughless attempt to modernize the Kramdens and Nortons is somewhat akin to sacrilege, as it waters down the characters and strips them of their unforgettable quirks and tics. Read more

Wesley Morris, Boston Globe: It's not as bad as the average Hollywood movie, it's stupendously worse. Read more

Carina Chocano, Los Angeles Times: John Leguizamo steals the show as its sleazy trainer -- not that there's much to steal from John Schultz's joylessly schematic paycheck. Read more

Amy Biancolli, Houston Chronicle: Why? Why would someone do this? How did we get here, watching mediocre remakes of classic 1950s sitcoms? What is the meaning of it all? Does cinema have a purpose beyond supporting the theater-concessions industry? Read more

Michael Booth, Denver Post: There have been funnier comedies. But there also have been far worse reasons to make a movie. Or remake a sitcom. Read more

Scott Brown, Entertainment Weekly: So...why remake this, again? Read more

Philip Wuntch, Dallas Morning News: The comedy wannabe has the lamest, most predictable banter of any recent movie. Read more

Scott Foundas, L.A. Weekly: A couple of bursts of inspired physical comedy notwithstanding, the normally unflappable Cedric (who also executive-produced) goes through the film plastered with a how'd-I-get-myself-into-this look on his face -- as does the audience. Read more

Jan Stuart, Newsday: A get-rich-quick picture about a guy with get-rich-quick dreams. The moon may shine high over Ralph Kramden's New York City, but sights are set depressingly low in the studio schemes of Hollywood. Read more

Lisa Rose, Newark Star-Ledger: The funny stuff is too scattered to forgive the buffoonish storyline. Read more

Jami Bernard, New York Daily News: The honeymoon is over. Read more

A.O. Scott, New York Times: Superfluous though it may be, The Honeymooners is not so bad. Read more

Roger Moore, Orlando Sentinel: The gags in this don't just feel played. They're exhausted. Read more

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: A surprise and a delight, a movie that escapes the fate of weary TV retreads and creates characters that remember the originals, yes, but also stand on their own. Read more

Walter V. Addiego, San Francisco Chronicle: Cannibalizing old programs has become a reflex action in Tinseltown, and as a result, audience expectations are low. It must be hard to resist the temptation to live down to them. Read more

Jeff Strickler, Minneapolis Star Tribune: What The Honeymooners does well, it does very well. The trouble is, it doesn't do enough of what it does well. Read more

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Read more

Liam Lacey, Globe and Mail: If not for a few interludes of lively riffing by John Leguizamo, playing a dog trainer and all-around hustler named Dodge, there would be nothing funny about any of this. Read more

Peter Howell, Toronto Star: The lunar destination aims far too high. This misbegotten movie heads straight for the dogs and the sewer, literally so. Read more

Time Out: Read more

Dave Calhoun, Time Out: Read more

Mike Clark, USA Today: Cedric and Epps have none of the team chemistry Gleason shared with Art Carney, and Epps' Norton displays none of Carney's eccentricities. Read more

Joe Leydon, Variety: Just funny enough to mollify purists and amuse the uninitiated. Read more

Mark Holcomb, Village Voice: The real problem is that the Kramdens' precarious financial situation, which gave the original its poignant frisson, is sidestepped. Read more

Desson Thomson, Washington Post: There's plenty of space up there for a colony of mediocre filmmakers. That's right, folks. To the moon. Bang! Zoom! Read more

Teresa Wiltz, Washington Post: Blame it all on the Bad Guys, those Hollywood suits who think by committee and never met a focus group they didn't like. This is product, pure and simple. Read more