Reviews provided by RottenTomatoes
Glenn Lovell, San Jose Mercury News: Fincher is a master of kinetic razzle-dazzle, goosing familiar or trite material to life with his high-tech bag of tricks. Read more
Jay Carr, Boston Globe: Foster usually makes intelligent choices, but, time and again, one wonders what she could have seen in David Koepp's script, which ranges from flimsy to nonexistent. Read more
Terry Lawson, Detroit Free Press: There is no shortage of twists and turns, but nearly all are easily maneuvered, and those that aren't only tend to test the traditional suspense-movie suspension of disbelief. Read more
Rene Rodriguez, Miami Herald: Tense, terrific, sweaty-palmed fun. Read more
Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper: ... one of the most ingenious and entertaining thrillers I've seen in quite a long time. Read more
Moira MacDonald, Seattle Times: It's a triumph of technical filmmaking; as a story, it's got ice in its heart. Read more
Jane Sumner, Dallas Morning News: A solidly constructed, entertaining thriller that stops short of true inspiration. Read more
Mark Caro, Chicago Tribune: Fincher mounts some clever, tense sequences in which the trio devises increasingly threatening strategies to force Meg and Sarah out of the panic room, only to be matched with improvised ingenuity from behind the vault door. Read more
A.O. Scott, New York Times: [Fincher's] camera sense and assured pacing make it an above-average thriller. Read more
John Anderson, Newsday: Taut and forbidding, enough so that you won't mind the implausibilities. Read more
Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal: Read more
Eleanor Ringel Gillespie, Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Suffers from a bad case of TMS -- Too Much Stupidity. Read more
Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times: What's surprising about this traditional thriller, moderately successful but not completely satisfying, is exactly how genteel and unsurprising the execution turns out to be. Read more
Eric Harrison, Houston Chronicle: A better-than-adequate thriller that nevertheless is badly matched to director David Fincher's talents. Read more
Steven Rosen, Denver Post: Director David Fincher and writer David Koepp can't sustain it. Read more
Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly: The skirmishes for power waged among victims and predators settle into an undistinguished rhythm of artificial suspense. Read more
Rick Groen, Globe and Mail: Yes, Fincher is stooping this time -- his posture may not be sublime, but he does manage to conquer most of our objections. Read more
Manohla Dargis, L.A. Weekly: There's just no denying Fincher's gifts. Give the guy a camera or two or three, millions upon millions of dollars and state-of-the-art technologies, and there's no stopping him. Read more
Peter Rainer, New York Magazine/Vulture: It's difficult to work up a strong case of the heebie-jeebies when you keep getting thrown out of the movie by all the atrocious acting. Read more
Rex Reed, New York Observer: Flawed but riveting, it won't be everyone's cocktail of choice, but if you can suspend disbelief long enough, you'll get a whopping good wallop without the hangover. Read more
James Berardinelli, ReelViews: The suspense in Panic Room never ebbs, and that makes for a thoroughly entertaining -- if somewhat exhausting -- 108 minutes. Read more
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: Once we sense Panic Room isn't going to cheat, it gathers in tension, because the characters are operating out of their own resources, and that makes them the players, not the pawns. Read more
Charles Taylor, Salon.com: Fincher takes no apparent joy in making movies, and he gives none to the audience. Read more
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: It might sometimes forget to make sense, but no matter, since it creates enough tension that the audience can hardly think anyway. Read more
Geoff Pevere, Toronto Star: It feels less like a suspense movie than a video-game spinoff of a suspense movie. Read more
Geoff Andrew, Time Out: Never averse to glistening darkness, meaty metaphor or grandiloquent technical display, Fincher is also surprisingly at home with hokum. Read more
Mike Clark, USA Today: Because Room's own time is limited to the 95-minute range, things move fast enough to make it a movie to enjoy and then forget. Read more
Todd McCarthy, Variety: A thinking-man's women-in-jeopardy picture, Panic Room does about as much as humanly possible with its deliberately restricted one-setting premise. Read more
J. Hoberman, Village Voice: As conventional as Fight Club was provocative. Read more