Die Hard: With a Vengeance 1995

Caryn James, New York Times: Pure action, with bigger and better explosions and stunts. Read more

Peter Rainer, Los Angeles Times: The big set pieces don't build, really, they just pile up. Read more

Entertainment Weekly: Read more

David Ansen, Newsweek: Read more

James Berardinelli, ReelViews: While parts one and two built momentum to an exhausting, exhilarating climax, part three has too many peaks and valleys (and, it seems, more of the latter than the former). Read more

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: Basically a wind-up action toy, cleverly made, and delivered with high energy. It delivers just what it advertises, with a vengeance. Read more

Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: An audience on the edge of its seat doesn't quibble about plot points. Read more

Time Out: There's little wit or originality on offer, just the familiar escalation of car chases and big bangs. Read more

Brian Lowry, Variety: Degenerates into an improbable, confusing series of chases and an overly involved heist that takes far too long to set up. Read more

Desson Thomson, Washington Post: A triumph. Read more

Rita Kempley, Washington Post: Explosions aren't so funny anymore. Read more