Code 46 2003

Critics score:
50 / 100

Reviews provided by RottenTomatoes

Terry Lawson, Detroit Free Press: A tedious slog. Read more

Erik Lundegaard, Seattle Times: It's a distinct, fully realized and fascinating world; it's the story Winterbottom places in the foreground that's unfulfilling. Read more

Allison Benedikt, Chicago Tribune: It's ambitious work but ultimately cold, distant and difficult to piece together. Read more

Carla Meyer, San Francisco Chronicle: Updates a classic premise -- the struggle for personal freedom -- by pairing it with ethical and moral quandaries. Read more

Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper: ... feels more like an intriguing work in progress than a complete film... Read more

Eleanor Ringel Gillespie, Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Winterbottom's movie may be cold, but it's still pretty cool. Read more

Bill Muller, Arizona Republic: A love story clothed in a science-fiction plot that fails to warm us with sentiment or dazzle us with cold logic. Read more

Ty Burr, Boston Globe: With all this intelligence in front of and behind the cameras, why then does Code 46 play like a William Gibson novel with all the juicy bits removed? Read more

Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times: Morton and Robbins are gifted actors, but they seem straitjacketed here, and the film finds it difficult to avoid tedium as their lugubrious relationship unfolds. Read more

Bruce Westbrook, Houston Chronicle: Winterbottom and screenwriter Frank Cottrell Boyce sell the sci-fi but botch the interpersonal. Read more

Vic Vogler, Denver Post: More a collage than a movie. Read more

Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly: Robbins and Morton make a sexy and moving pair of desperadoes; you mourn their every loss. Read more

Jason Anderson, Globe and Mail: A vision of the future that is as haunting as it is dispiriting. Read more

Gary Dowell, Dallas Morning News: A curious and mostly rewarding tale of a love affair in a world of genetic policing and travel restrictions. Read more

Scott Foundas, L.A. Weekly: If the movie is finally something of a failure as a romance, it's rarely less than a triumph of soulful imagination. Read more

John Anderson, Newsday: Robbins and Morton, both fine actors, have no chemistry whatsoever. Their love story may as well have been written by Jules Verne. Read more

Peter Rainer, New York Magazine/Vulture: Their doomy romance is supposed to be fated, but it just seems sloggy, certainly not the stuff of myth. Read more

Lisa Rose, Newark Star-Ledger: It's that rare thing, an intelligent date movie, a celluloid romance with enough substance to fill a thesis paper. Read more

Jack Mathews, New York Daily News: For what is at heart a thriller, Code 46 lacks both energy and tension. Read more

Lou Lumenick, New York Post: The diminutive actress [Morton] and the much taller Robbins make the season's most improbable screen couple since Tom Hanks and Catherine Zeta-Jones in The Terminal. Read more

A.O. Scott, New York Times: Michael Winterbottom's somber dystopian romance is thick with disquieting, not always coherent ideas about the effects of globalization on human intimacy. Read more

Jay Boyar, Orlando Sentinel: Amid the white walls and slick surfaces of this film, the characters seem more like lab rats than human beings. Read more

James Berardinelli, ReelViews: Flat, boring, pointless, and nonsensical. Read more

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: I cannot say I understand the hows and whys of this future world, nor do I much care, since it's mostly a clever backdrop to a love affair that would easily teleport to many other genres. Read more

Jeff Strickler, Minneapolis Star Tribune: The disquieting and depressing sci-fi romance Code 46 is an interesting exercise, but the same can't always be said about it as a movie. Read more

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Read more

Peter Howell, Toronto Star: Robbins and Morton play star-crossed lovers, and they're among the most risible pair to grace the screen in quite some time. Read more

Time Out: Read more

Claudia Puig, USA Today: It's all very ambitious -- and thought-provoking. But, at only 92 minutes, one wishes the script had been further developed and the film executed with more clarity. Read more

David Stratton, Variety: Read more

J. Hoberman, Village Voice: A noirish romance, bathed in new age trance music and trippy golden light, Code 46 feels like Blade Runner on meds. Read more

Desson Thomson, Washington Post: You may soon forget the specifics of the plot, but you'll always remember the world it came from. Read more

Stephen Hunter, Washington Post: Commits a Code 1 violation: It's boring. Read more