Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle 2003

Critics score:
43 / 100

Reviews provided by RottenTomatoes

Wesley Morris, Boston Globe: The movie's glee is contagious. Read more

Terry Lawson, Detroit Free Press: Full Throttle is self-deprecating without being smug about it, a movie that knows how not only to make a joke but to take a joke. Read more

Rene Rodriguez, Miami Herald: The movie is a giant goof, and a good one, as long as you're in the mood to play along. Read more

Richard Roeper, Ebert & Roeper: It's like a whole movie done by Maxim magazine. Read more

Mark Caro, Chicago Tribune: There wasn't much story in the first installment, even less this time, and what's here doesn't make a lick of sense. Read more

Elvis Mitchell, New York Times: Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle is like eating a bowl of Honeycomb drenched in Red Bull -- a dizzying mouthful of unabashed silliness that leads to an equally precipitous crash once the buzz wears off after the film's first hour. Read more

Steve Murray, Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Has its moments, but never takes wing. Read more

Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times: Despite the fact that a group of gifted professionals created exactly the cinematic effects they were after, it's hard to take great pleasure in what's been achieved. Read more

Eric Harrison, Houston Chronicle: There's nothing pleasurable about the noise, aggressive cutting and assaultive, comic-book action. Read more

Paul Clinton (CNN.com), CNN.com: Somehow this movie manages to be sassy yet completely juvenile, smart yet moronic, and totally mindless all the way -- yet very entertaining. Read more

Lisa Kennedy, Denver Post: The goodness of Full Throttle resides not in its being good but in the joyous spirit with which its stars go at playing Angels. Read more

Entertainment Weekly: Read more

Philip Wuntch, Dallas Morning News: Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle bears a queasy resemblance to the worst of Burt Reynolds. It's this summer's Cannonball Run. Read more

Scott Foundas, L.A. Weekly: Sometimes, you have the misfortune of ending up in a cinema with an incessantly crying baby close at hand. And sometimes, that wailing brat is the movie itself. Read more

John Anderson, Newsday: Full Throttle is a movie cut like a trailer -- and doesn't everyone say the trailers are better than the movies? Read more

Bob Campbell, Newark Star-Ledger: Twice the splash and half the goofy charm of the first Charlie's Angels. Read more

Jami Bernard, New York Daily News: As its own collection of Angels' Greatest Hits, Full Throttle winds up embracing the spirit of the original TV series, supplanting it and gleefully eviscerating it. Read more

James Berardinelli, ReelViews: As a whole, the movie is an irritating blend of little things that work and big things that don't. Read more

Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times: Harmless, brainless, good-natured fun. Read more

Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com: In Full Throttle, returning director McG works much harder, for only about half the effect. Read more

Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle: This is something rare: a movie that insulates itself against its own rottenness by being lousy by design. Read more

David Edelstein, Slate: It's like a third-rate Austin Powers picture cut to the whacking, attention-deficit-disorder tempo of Moulin Rouge. Read more

Colin Covert, Minneapolis Star Tribune: A wildly expensive collection of cheap thrills delivered with verve and a solid sense of irony. Read more

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: Read more

Peter Howell, Toronto Star: [A] seizure-inducing extreme fashion show. Read more

Time Out: It's a bombastic blast while it lasts. Read more

Mike Clark, USA Today: Hard-sell and impersonal, the second Angels outing may be full throttle, but it's running on an empty tank. Read more

Amy Dawes, Variety: Bigger, sleeker and better than the first, sequel Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle is a joyride of a movie that takes the winning elements of the year 2000 hit to the next level. Read more

J. Hoberman, Village Voice: A loud and frequently funny clown show. Read more

Ann Hornaday, Washington Post: A nearly two-hour exercise in chaotic action and coarse, annoyingly coy sexuality. Read more

Desson Thomson, Washington Post: Don't expect the giddy charm of the first film. Read more