Written at 27 Apr 2013 on 09:15
Wrong.
DPI does matter for image quality. Firstly, the link above is basically crap. And Old! If I took a photo with a 2 megapixel camera, and then another with a 16 megapixal camera which do you think would be better? More pixels equals better quality, more dots per inch or pixels per inch also gives better quality due to more colour and detail information in the composition.
Also, If I resize an image of 2000 x 3000 at 72dpi, your calculation @PailjtePanter would be incorrect. You cannot determine the DPI of an image simply by it's size. Most web images are 72dpi.
In Photoshop, you can take a 2000 x 3000 image and save it as 72dpi which will retain enough pixels for home printing. For industrial printing (like in a printers) for Raster artwork a minimum DPI of 300-400 is required for quality. No need to worry about DPI for vector artwork as it's scalable to infinity, but you still need a high DPI for mixed media of raster and vector.
The Poster above for 'Drive' is 3500 x 5000 and has a DPI of 300 and a bit depth of 24 and is an sRGB image. For print, sRGB or CYMK is preferred. The images was created in Photoshop CS5 and brought into InDesign CS5 to add the typography and then saved out.
Last bit of info. DPI is for print, PPI is for Computer Monitors. Print works by spraying dots of ink onto the source material, i,e paper, plastic. PPI is the Pixels per Inch on your display. This is why Video is always something like 720p or 1080i (interlaced, consists of two sequential fields of 1920 horizontal and 1080 vertical pixels).