CineMaterial logo

General - Rejected?

Paj User

Written at 07 Jun 2018 on 01:34

Wait. what? Why my last 2 uploads were rejected? I dont see the reason why. I personally think they are better quality to be honest.
Can you state why it is rejected? Kind of disappointed.
Venue User

Written at 02 Mar 2021 on 21:01

Bumping, this is unacceptable, any denial should be thoroughly explained, let the user know what it was rejected.
Members will lose faith and trust in your website if you keep your mouth shut and do your business behind curtains.
Stay transparent, stay welcoming, your website will increase in traffic, an increase in traffic means more donation money.
stigmata920 User

Written at 09 Mar 2021 on 15:58

Why my last 3 uploads were rejected?
stigmata920 User

Written at 04 Apr 2021 on 11:52

Why my 14 uploads rejected?
Someone answer already!!!!!!!!!
RoLe Moderator

Written at 05 Apr 2021 on 03:28

Please avoid:
Movie stills, lobby cards, wallpapers, promo shots and custom (fan-made) posters
Porn movies
Image quality:
No blow-ups: do not artificially increase resolution
Please remove any black or white borders from vintage scans
Please remove any blue and grey borders from Blu-Ray covers
Only upload images of posters we already have when the quality is significantly higher
stigmata920 User

Written at 06 Apr 2021 on 16:56

RoLe wrote:
Please avoid:
Movie stills, lobby cards, wallpapers, promo shots and custom (fan-made) posters
Porn movies
Image quality:
No blow-ups: do not artificially increase resolution
Please remove any black or white borders from vintage scans
Please remove any blue and grey borders from Blu-Ray covers
Only upload images of posters we already have when the quality is significantly higher
There were no artificially increased resolutions, no borders on any of the uploaded posters, no fan posters. Therefore, I do not understand why they were deleted. I don't know any specific mistakes, the psossers met the requirements.
micio684 User

Written at 02 May 2021 on 20:53

Hello stimmate920
Many of my textless were deleted and I never got a reply. In ancient times they canceled my textless, because they were signed by Italy. You will never get an answer as to why they cancel!
lmaq Moderator

Written at 12 May 2021 on 13:12

To admit a textless poster, must exists a real one. Otherwise it must be considered promo shot.
micio684 User

Written at 20 May 2021 on 15:36

lmaq wrote:
To admit a textless poster, must exists a real one. Otherwise it must be considered promo shot.

Ok, but what if there is no textless, right? a customized one might be fine. Many textless are not original but custom. If done right, why not publish them?
thank you for the reply
micio684 User

Written at 03 Jun 2021 on 18:20

Hello.
Why do you first approve my textless and then delete them? Some time ago I uploaded the textless of, censor 2021 (https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/censor-i10329614/p/jonxlfxu) of excellent quality, and it was deleted. Now I see that the same image has been uploaded by some user, of poor quality (https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/censor-i10329614/p/xzamsril), and his has not been deleted.
This is to give an example. Be at least impartial in judging textless!
lmaq Moderator

Written at 04 Jun 2021 on 15:45

Maybe you upload the textless poster before the original
micio684 User

Written at 04 Jun 2021 on 18:47

lmaq wrote:
Maybe you upload the textless poster before the original

Thanks for the reply.
Yes, my textless is my creation starting from the base of the original poster. But what is loaded in low quality is not original, because the original texless are all high quality, minimum 300 DPI.
There are not all the original films without text, there are very few of them, and no one can certify the existence or not of the original version, many are personal creations.
PS: however I see that it is a continuous approval and disapproval of my textless, there is a lot of confusion among you moderators, because you cannot know if the original textless exists or not. No one can have a sure source whether or not there is textless.
I upload only to make my works available to users, and create a textless, it takes a lot of time and passion, and if it's not okay let me know that I don't upload anymore.
micio684 User

Written at 06 Jun 2021 on 19:28 Edited at 06 Jun 2021 on 19:28

More and more confused your moderators, you have deleted this from me: https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/uncharted-drakes-fortune-i1464335/p/mhvpfnnm, which is an original poster ...
Help!!!!! I have no words to say how sorry
micio684 User

Written at 23 Aug 2021 on 20:10

Good evening.
I still don't understand why many of my textless are deleted, some original and some from my creations.
When I see that low quality textless created (https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/stillwater-i10696896/p/urnjom0f) are accepted, I ask why mine was rejected (https: //www.cinematerial .com / movies / stillwater-i10696896 / p / 2encscu3)
There are many other examples to show, but I would like it all to be fair and not just my creations need to be discarded.
I don't understand why you don't judge on the quality of the images and not on why they are custom or original.
The original textless can't be a few MB, yet there are so many approved textless under 2MB, how is that possible?
Thank you for a possible answer.
Carlito Editor

Written at 25 Aug 2021 on 06:12 Edited at 25 Aug 2021 on 06:24

Hopefully you get an answer soon. It could be 1 mod or several mods and only they can tell you the reasons why. If you don't get a reply, then report each poster individually as that's how I got answers for my deletions in the past.
micio684 User

Written at 28 Aug 2021 on 09:09

Thanks to Carlito for the information.
Why was this textless rejected? It is of excellent quality without any flaws, (https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/superhost-i13309978/p/jkqwkvu5)(7118 kb)
I still don't understand, why my texless are deleted, when there are a lot of textless, recently loaded bad quality and accepted.
Previous replies to my messages don't make sense if I then see these textless, it's unfair in principle!
This is to give an example.
1) https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/wrath-of-man-i11083552/p/9w0o8dic (713 kb)
2) https://www.cinematerial.com/tv/the-walking-dead-i1520211/p/fqvdghvr (197 kb)
3) https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/no-man-of-god-i13507778/p/znwxvjnh (585 kb)
4) https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/tides-i6506264/p/dddbqncj (518 kb)
5) https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/how-to-deter-a-robber-i9269988/p/slibeqeu (866 kb).
micio684 User

Written at 30 Aug 2021 on 08:20

This is an original poster, why was it deleted ????
https: //www.cinematerial.com/movies/venom-let-there-be-carnage-i7097896/p/0up3jm0v
lmaq Moderator

Written at 05 Sep 2021 on 23:07

Something is wrong in this adress.
May be your textless is repeated?
micio684 User

Written at 06 Sep 2021 on 21:27

lmaq wrote:
Something is wrong in this adress.
May be your textless is repeated?

Thank you for the answer Imaq, at least someone deigns to answer.
This textless of mine has been deleted (https: //www.cinematerial.com/movies/venom-let-there-be-carnage-i7097896/p/0up3jm0v), because a new textless with better quality has been uploaded, ok I accept it even if it arrived later on my upload.
But why have these been accepted that they are of poor quality?
1) https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/wrath-of-man-i11083552/p/9w0o8dic (713 kb)
2) https://www.cinematerial.com/tv/the-walking-dead-i1520211 / p / fqvdghvr (197 kb)
3) https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/no-man-of-god-i13507778/p/znwxvjnh (585 kb)
4) https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/tides-i6506264/p/dddbqncj (518 kb)
5) https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/how-to-deter-a-robber-i9269988 / p / slibeqeu (866 kb).
There are many other low quality ones that have been approved and it doesn't seem fair to me that they accept medium / low quality textless, but I don't want to argue about the rules you set. Once upon a time we looked at quality, and even if textless were custom they were accepted, now not anymore. This is a regret, because one is committed to creating textless that does not exist for users, but since the commitment is quality it doesn't matter anymore, I will desist in uploading them or uploading elsewhere. It was a nice site where you could count on the quality of the images, custom or not, now I think it has gotten worse. this is just my opinion.
AWesker User

Written at 22 Sep 2021 on 04:18 Edited at 22 Sep 2021 on 04:31

Just had a whole batch of uploads rejected as "blowups." None of them were blowups, all were cover scans of stuff I've got. Wasn't applied consistently either.

Approved (outer cover):
https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/lady-dragon-2-i107356/p/xtwn9i6g

Rejected (inner cover of the same tape)
https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/lady-dragon-2-i107356/p/rxhqk3vv

Same settings.

Ditto, approved:
https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/highlander-2-i102034/p/hrrcj3ft

Same settings, rejected:
https://www.cinematerial.com/movies/highlander-2-i102034/p/68c8xqly

I had a bunch of covers uploaded and approved previously with the same size/rez/settings which is why I started uploading these ones, so I'm confused as to why these ones were mostly rejected. Want to confirm what's wrong with 'em before I waste everyone's time uploading more (I'm scanning fronts and backs of my entire physical collection for my database, so there's a couple thousand tapes to go through that I'd be tossing at you)